“Scientific Research has been my passion”

S. Ignacimuthu, SJ, explains how he acquired a passion for scientific research that has led him to many achievements and awards.

By S. Ignacimuthu, SJ

Introduction

Scientific research is an opportunity to take part in the ongoing plan of God’s creation. Rigorous intellectual pursuit, especially in science, has been an integral part of the Society of Jesus’ mission from the beginning. The testimony borne by innumerable number of Jesuits throughout the world is a clear indication of this special charism of the Society. Our Mother Society gave me also the opportunity to be involved in scientific research and thus contribute to this noble tradition of rigorous intellectual apostolate. My mission through scientific research is founded on the Spiritual Exercises of St Ignatius of Loyola. The ‘Contemplation to obtain love’ is the cornerstone of my mission. The more I understand the mysteries of Nature, the closer I get in my relationship with God.

Initiation

When I was doing my undergraduate studies in Botany during 1969 to 1972 at Loyola College, Chennai, the professors encouraged me and constantly motivated me to get interested in the subject. They helped me publish a paper on biodiversity in the College magazine. During Philosophy studies from 1972 to 1975, I had very good opportunity to promote my interest in science when I was in-charge of the museum at Sacred Heart College, Shembaganur and the care-taker for the orchid and fern gardens. I collected many species of orchids, ferns, cacti and insects and enriched the museum and the gardens.

Based on these experiences I wrote an article on ‘Growing orchids’ and another on ‘Growing cacti’ and got them published in the magazine sections of the newspapers  like The Indian Express and The Hindu. A research article on the biological changes in Kodaikanal was published in a science journal with Fr K.M. Mathew, S.J. a renowned plant taxonomist, as the lead author. During 1975-1976, I had an opportunity to teach at St Xavier’s College, Palayamkottai which also gave me a taste for the subject. From 1976 to 1978, I did my M.Sc. Botany at St Joseph’s College, Tiruchirapalli. Fr Mathew filled me with great enthusiasm to pursue scientific research seriously and consider it as my special mission in the Society. He put me in touch with many good professors at Delhi University. I did my M.Phil. and Ph.D. at Delhi University along with my teaching in the department of Botany at St Joseph’s College. Professor C.R. Babu in Delhi trained me to take up scientific research and remain devoted to it.

The more I understand the mysteries of Nature, the closer I get in my relationship with God.

Research projects

In 1986, I received two government-funded research projects which helped me publish some research papers. In June 1990, I was invited by the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria to present a paper at the international conference. This helped me build contacts with some scientists. In 1993, I moved over to Entomology Research Institute (ERI) at Loyola College, Chennai. This formed a very good base for carrying out multidisciplinary research and bringing out many good publications.

Between 1994 and 1996, I went to Kaiserslautern Technical University, Germany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA, Technical University (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland and National Institute, Okasaki, Japan for my post-doctoral research. During this period, I learnt many modern techniques related to biological research. Based on my post-doctoral works I was able to publish many research articles which were later compiled together and submitted to the University of Madras, Chennai which awarded me the degree of Doctor of Science, in 2001.

Research at ERI

At Entomology Research Institute (ERI), Loyola, Chennai we made it a point to carry out socially relevant research works in different fields of biology and medicinal chemistry with the intention of promoting interdisciplinary research. We worked on various areas such as organic farming, sustainable agriculture, biodiversity, environmental protection, medicinal plants, human health, biospesticides to control mosquitoes and other types of insects, genetic engineering, tissue culture, molecular breeding and so on.

Many research articles and some books have been published on these. We have been conducting environmental awareness campaigns among farmers, women, schools and college students. Many popular books and articles were written to create greater awareness among the students and the public. We have been promoting organic farming and sustainable agriculture for many years. The farmers have been trained in various methods relating to organic farming. Many booklets have been prepared and supplied to farmers to be used as self-guides.

In 1993, I moved over to Entomology Research Institute (ERI) at Loyola College, Chennai. This formed a very good base for carrying out multidisciplinary research and bringing out many good publications.

We took enormous efforts to verify the traditional claims and substantiate them with scientific evidence. We have also used bioinformatics tools to validate these findings. All these have resulted in numerous publications and patents related to the above mentioned areas. Many natural extracts, compounds, oils and formulations were scientifically tested and recommended to the farmers for agricultural pest management. One of the products, Ponneem’, formulated by us is manufactured and marketed by Nimbion Organics company, Chennai.

My colleagues and I have written more than 800 research articles which have been appreciated by scientists from all parts of the world. More than 400 gene sequences have been submitted in Genbank for public use. So far we have carried out more than 45 major research projects through which more than 100 students were able to get their doctoral degrees. Our papers have been cited more than 26,000 times by other scientists.

Many natural extracts, compounds, oils and formulations were scientifically tested and recommended to the farmers for agricultural pest management.

Research at Xavier Research Foundation (XRF)

In 2018, I went to St Xavier’s College, Palayamkottai to establish XRF and promote research. Here we are working on similar lines as mentioned above. During Covid-19 pandemic we developed herbal Xavier Hand Sanitizer. We have also developed Xavier herbal termite controller, Xavier herbal hand wash, Xavier herbal disinfectant and Xavier herbal mosquito coils and incense sticks.

We are establishing an Agro-tourism centre with a view to expose students and public to organic farming and integrated agriculture. Through another project we are equipping the laboratory with high-tech instruments for good research. We are working on the ‘Flora of Tirunelveli Hills’ in four volumes.

Patents, Awards and Recognitions

Based on these works, 2 US Patents and 12 Indian Patents were obtained. 10 more Indian Patents are in the pipe line. One trademark was also secured. An insect species is named after me: Jacthrips ignacimuthui. One natural molecule is named after me: Ignaciomycin.

Recognizing the significant contributions, the Government of Tamil Nadu awarded ‘Tamil Nadu Scientist Award for Life Sciences’ in 2001 and ‘Karmaveerar Kamarajar Award for Environmental Management’ in 2008. The National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, New Delhi made me a prestigious fellow of the academy in 2009. I am a fellow of Royal Entomological Society, London, England and a fellow of Entomological Society of India. I am the Chief Editor of the Indian Journal of Natural Products Resources, Government of India.

In October 2020, I was identified as one of the top 1% Scientists in the field of Plant Biology based on the number of citations by Professors of Stanford University, U.S. (DOI.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000918). Following this, Very Rev. Fr Arturo Sosa, SJ, the Superior General of the Society wrote a beautiful letter on 3 December 2020. “You manifest one of the most important characteristics of the Jesuit Mission – Intellectual pursuit. In a world of superficiality, you live a life of intense search and scientific knowledge….As I have always reminded our brothers the intellectual apostolate is part of our Jesuit DNA. You are a living witness to that reminder.”

I was given Saint Peter Canisius award on 6 August 2022 at Boston College, USA by the International Association of Jesuit Universities for my contribution to higher education. I was given Dr A.P.J. Abdul Klam award on 15 August 2022 by the honourable Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, Mr M.K.Stalin, for my contributions in the field of Development of Science.

Books

One of my books on ‘Environmental Awareness’, written in Tamil, got the best book award from the Government of Tamil Nadu in 1994. I have written more than 80 books; nearly 55 of them are on topics related to science. Many of my books are used as text books in universities and colleges both in India and other foreign countries.

A word to young Jesuits

Passion is very important for anyone who wants to attain certain level of perfection. This has been true in the case of a number of sports stars and other achievers in other fields. With regard to research and intellectual pursuit, a strong desire to contribute something is very important. Only this will push us on steadily to move forward in spite of the many obstacles and difficulties on our way. Along with passion, hard work is also very essential, since there is no substitute for hard work. Only persistent and enduring hard work will bring the desired results. We need to stay motivated to do our best.

Conclusion

If we believe nature is God’s gift to us, then finding new things in nature and proclaiming them is also an aspect of revealing God to others. I must acknowledge the tremendous grace of God which has guided me all through.  I was able to do all these because of the love the Society of Jesus had bestowed on me. I owe everything to our Mother Society.

God has blessed me abundantly and I have given in return whatever He has given me. I owe these achievements to the hard work and dedication of my staff and students who have toiled with me in this labor of love.


Fr. S. Ignacimuthu, SJ, is Director, Xavier Research Foundation, St Xavier’s College, Palayamkottai – 627 002, Tamil Nadu, India. Email : imuthus@hotmail.com.

Do you know this generation?

V. Joseph Xavier, SJ, describes the character traits of Gen Z to whom most of our students belong.

Most of our students, who belong to Gen Z, are very different

By V. Joseph Xavier, SJ

Introduction

If we have to understand our youth, particularly our students, we have to know what sociologists say about what they call the Z generation (Gen Z). They are also called ‘Post-Millennials.’ They are called so, because millennials, born between 1981 and 1996, are called Gen Y.

Who are those who belong to Gen Z?  Those born between the year 1996 and 2010 belong to Gen Z. This means now (2022) their age may be between 12 and 26. The 21st century is the century of Gen Z. The first truly digital natives, they live in the world of smart phones, social media, internet, multi-tasking, and gaming. They are known as the glass generation as they use iPad and computers for their learning. The use of technology is likely the most common characteristic of Gen Z. They live their lives online, and they love sharing both intimate and mundane details of their life, like their relationship status, a restaurant review or an Instagram photo of themselves.

Some of them have completed their studies, and are now working as businessmen/women, CEOs or entrepreneurs. Many of them are in colleges, undergoing higher education of their choice. 

Different

Their motivations, learning styles, characteristics, skill sets, and social concerns are different from those of previous generations. While being skeptical about the cost and value of higher education, they are also entrepreneurial, innovative, and independent learners, and are concerned about effecting social change. Understanding Gen Z’s mindset and goals is crucial to imparting higher education to them.

Right from birth

Gen Zs were born into a world that takes for granted several gadgets. They were born with a television in every house, cell phones in every hand and air conditioner in all middle class families. Unlike the previous generations, they were exposed to technology from birth.

But what they are today, whatever they have achieved or become, directly depends on the kind of education they get and the type of influence the outside world has on them.

Education

Studies reveal that a majority of Gen Zs (about 80 per cent) think that school education is important to create a base for future. They take academics, cultural activities, small school level competitions and other events seriously. The 12 years of school help them become disciplined. Not all achieve equal success, but they get into college for further education. About 2 per cent start building their careers at the school level itself.  This is less as compared to older generations because many countries have made school education compulsory. UNESCO’s ‘Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2010’, says that about 135 countries have constitutional provisions for free and non-discriminatory education for all.

Their Learning Style

Gen Z students are digital integrators, simple and flexible, connected to a borderless world, visual learners, prefer flexible learning and want the teachers to communicate and engage them in the process of learning. They try to assess the relevance of what they are taught. They want to have access to technology. They are multi taskers.  They prefer social interaction.  They are  entrepreneurial. 

They think digital in all assignments and activities.  They tend to break the content into short segments.  They want their time to be respected and would prefer individualized instruction. They want access to resources and would like to be acknowledged as smart, creative and hard working.

Unlike the previous generations, they were exposed to technology from birth. But what they are today, whatever they have achieved or become, directly depends on the kind of education they get.

Desire to achieve

Their focus is on getting good grades.  They see college as the key to a high- paying job and success, and miss the bigger picture of what a college education should be about. They are pressured to decide early on a career – and have been put on a career track orientation very young, even from school. Their focus is more on the world of achievement rather than personal development.

Gen Z want to find a niche for themselves in the world.   They want to rule, enjoy power, want followers, but they want to do it with talent as a weapon, not bullets and bombs. About 40-45 per cent of Gen Z migrate to other countries for post-graduation or jobs. Their number may increase further in the future.

Dividing  line blurred

Since they have grown up with technologies at their fingertips, the dividing line between work and social life, of study and entertainment, of private and public life has blurred. They live in an open book environment – just a few clicks away from any information. They connect in a borderless world across countries and cultures, and they communicate in a post-literate community where texts and tweets are brief, and where visuals and videos are the way they communicate.

Special & important

As most families have just one or two children, Gen Z are used to being treated as special and important They are the most wanted generation. Every milestone in their lives is marked with celebrations and praise. Hence, they carry a sense of entitlement and expect frequent positive feedback. It has been instilled in them that they are vital to their parents, families and nation. They feel they are here to solve the world’s problems that older generations have failed to solve. They may claim they want privacy, but they crave attention at the same time.

Sheltered

They have been highly protected as children. They have grown up at a time of increasing safety measures (car seats, baby on board signs and class rooms and public spaces equipped with CCTV cameras). They are rarely left unsupervised. They are sheltered from having to take care of their conflicts as parents do it on their behalf, and “spare” them from unpleasant experiences.  Therefore naturally when they come to the college, they expect the faculty and staff to shelter, protect, and nurture them – and resolve their conflicts for them. Unable to handle conflicts or stress from schools, studies, peers and parents, they go to the extent of taking their lives.  Gen Z are the focus of the most sweeping youth safety movement in human history.

Outside the classroom

Traditionally, learning took place mainly in the classroom and the students learned to apply what they learned through homework. Today content can be accessed through technology anywhere, and often in very visual and engaging forms. Thus, most of their learning takes place outside the classroom.  But the essential engagement and practice is still conducted at school, by the all-important facilitator, rather than the teacher.

Global as never before

They are mobile in terms of the jobs they will have and the homes they will live in. It is therefore important to think about how one can equip this generation with not just content but resilience in a changing world. They are truly global and are the most likely generation to work in multiple countries. They are the most globally connected and influenced generation in history. Therefore they are not limited to the local but are global as never before.

The first truly digital natives, they live in the world of smart phones, social media, internet, multi-tasking, and gaming.

Visual

For Gen Z messages have increasingly become image-based.  Signs, logos and brands communicate across language barriers with colour and picture. Communicating symbols and pictures with stories is not a new concept. Most ancient forms of communication such as rock art, tell stories through pictures.   Visuals are also the way in which the brain processes information best.  Earlier auditory delivery dominated the classroom. The teacher just kept talking to the students. But Gen Z depend on the visual and ‘hands on learning styles’.

Confident

They are motivated, goal-oriented, and confident in themselves and the future. They expect college to launch them to greatness. They brag about their generation’s power and potential. They have high levels of optimism.  They are assertive and believe they are “right”.

Team- oriented

They are group-oriented rather than being individualistic. They may sacrifice their individual identity to be part of a team. They prefer egalitarian leadership.  They are a tight-knit generation. They do not want to stand out among their peers.  They want to be seen as part of the group. They dislike selfishness and are oriented toward service and volunteerism. While they are group-oriented among themselves, they may “politely” exclude other generations.

Pressured

Right from their childhood, their time has been tightly scheduled.  They are used to having every hour of their day filled with structured activity.  Sadly, this generation has lost a sense of spontaneous play. They struggle with handling free time.They feel pressured to succeed. They have been pushed hard to achieve, to avoid risks, and to take advantage of opportunities. They think multi-tasking saves time and is a smart thing to do but are not usually aware of the poorer quality of results.

Open to others

They want to communicate with people from other lands and other cultures. They want to diminish the boundaries, and they want to believe that people in other lands are the same, except the culture. They believe that someday in future, the whole world will share the same culture. Their idols, their inspirations, their idea of love, their idea of passion, their idea of success are uniquely their own. This is why older generations cannot force their ideas of all these on them. The older generations may try to persuade them with tales of their success and achievements, but Gen Z will manage to find a loophole in everything the older generations present to them.

More curious, more connected

They are young, they are wild, they are curious, and they are the strongest force on this earth. They have the capability to change everything that is built today. Being part of the most technologically advanced generation in history has provided them with some distinct advantages.

They have a positive attitude towards technology and are not afraid to try new things. Because they’re comfortable exploring the Internet, they are more connected to the world than previous generations. When they’re curious about a subject, they’ll often research it online. They stay connected to the media all the time. Eager to adopt technology at all levels, they tend to push others to do the same. They approach all aspects of life from a global and visual perspective.   They crave for technology-enhanced learning opportunities. They look for educational opportunities that use visually enhanced methods of teaching. They know more about other cultures and are often more tolerant of cultural differences.

Since they have grown up with technologies at their fingertips, the dividing line between work and social life, of study and entertainment, of private and public life has blurred.

Differences between Gen Y and Gen Z

Fifty per cent of Gen Z prefer to save money than to spend it, unlike Gen Y. They prefer shopping online for almost all their purchases unlike the previous generations. While Gen Y watched YouTube, Hulu and Netflix, Gen Z want to co-create, live stream, and help to make up the activity as they participate. While Gen Y loved sports and adventure, Gen Z sees sports as a health tool, not for play. While Gen Y initiated text messages as a norm, Gen Z prefers communicating through images, icons and symbols.

Conclusion

As educators and as the teachers of Gen Z, we need to keep in mind they are a digital, visual, creative generation. We must remember that they want to be recognised for their contribution and so we need to express appreciation for their efforts and encourage them.   They are confident of their ability, and we need to affirm it.  Teachers of earlier generations may forget that Gen Z want individual attention in learning and want the teacher to involve them in their learning.  They are social in outlook and are interested in social issues. This will help in making them aware of social problems. Their global outlook may inspire teachers of earlier generations to give up their narrow, provincial outlook.


A former Principal of Loyola College, Chennai, and former Research Director at the Indian Social Institute, Bangalore, V. Joseph Xavier, SJ has worked in the field of Higher Education for more than 40 years. He can be reached at: vjosephxaviersj@gmail.com.

“Into that heaven of freedom…”

Cedric Prakash, SJ, points out the alarming rise all over the world of politicians and parties that do not care for democracy or human rights.

By Cedric Prakash, SJ

Democracy is in peril! There is no doubt about that! We see how democracy (and the values it embodies) is slowly but surely being dismantled in country after country. On 25 September  2022 Giorgia Meloni’s ‘Brothers of Italy’ party won the snap general elections in Italy. The party, which is the most ultra-right-wing party to gain power in Italy since Mussolini’s fascism, is known for its anti-immigrant stand and its disdain for human rights, particularly those of women and of the LGBTQI community. 

A few days earlier, there was another shock awaiting the people of Europe: Sweden, once regarded as a bastion of democracy and of liberal values, voted by a slim margin for a right-wing government.  Analysts said that the recent vote had been one of the closest in modern times and reflected a desire by Swedes to move in a new direction after decades of centre-left policy-making that has included openness toward asylum seekers, emphasis on individual liberties and adherence to socially liberal ideals. All cherished values of democracy! There are other countries in Europe like Belarus and Hungary that have blatantly shed any pretence of being democracies as authoritarianism has taken over. In Belarus, the elections are openly rigged and civil liberties are throttled. The despotic President there has total control of the military, the judiciary and other institutions that are meant to be independent. Pro-democracy protests and movements are dealt with severely.

It was a black day for democracy, when the U.S. Capitol was ‘invaded’ on 6 January 2021.Donald Trump called his supporters to Washington DC for a ‘Stop the Steal’ rally on the day Congress would count the votes of the Electoral College. No one expected the violence and the mayhem that would take place in the world’s oldest democracy. The world watched with shock and angst. Such a terrible reality could not be happening in the United States and more so, instigated by an outgoing President.

Watching the apparent falling apart of the great American democracy, the world leaders reacted swiftly and strongly. Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor said Mr. Trump bore responsibility for the riot by his supporters. “Unfortunately, President Trump did not accept his defeat since November, not even yesterday, and that has naturally created an environment that enabled such violent events.” Her foreign minister, Heiko Maas, was even more blunt, drawing a parallel with Hitler’s power grab. “Violent actions come from inflammatory words on the steps of the Reichstag and now in the Capitol,” he said, in reference to the burning of republican Germany’s parliament building in 1933. “Disregarding democratic institutions has devastating consequences.”

Democracy in India is in the doldrums too. India attained her independence on 15 August 1947; later the Constituent Assembly gave the people of India a democratic and visionary Constitution, based on the four non-negotiable pillars of justice, liberty, equality and fraternity. For years India went to town priding herself of being the world’s largest democracy. But suddenly those very institutions which are meant to be the bulwark of democracy have begun collapsing like a pack of cards.

On 25 September 2022 Giorgia Meloni’s ‘Brothers of Italy’ party won the snap general elections in Italy.

In the recent past, particularly since 2019, there has been a dramatic and drastic erosion in the democratic space in every respect and particularly for dissent in the country; the ordinary citizen has been experiencing this in many brutal ways. The calculated destruction of democratic values and of the rights of the citizens takes place at a frightening regularity. Hate speech is on the rise; the demonization and the denigration of the ‘other’, particularly the minorities, have gained official legitimacy. The perpetrators indulge in verbal and physical violence with impunity, knowing full well that nothing will eventually happen to them. A strategy that has been central to the erosion of democratic space has been the weaponizing of the criminal justice system by the State, to harass and punish those who dare to protest against the anti-people and anti-Constitutional policies and actions of the Government.

The disheartening part, in my opinion, is that the judiciary in India has not sufficiently played the role of being independent, impartial and for ‘the people of India’. Quite a few judges have often acted in a partisan manner and have been reluctant to speak truth to power and restore justice. Earlier, the mainstream media allowed for expression of protest and raised issues of such injustice; unfortunately, today it has become the voice of the State and an important medium to popularise the narrative of the State. Several human rights activists are in jail. Their friends and supporters have built up a campaign for their release and against the use of draconian laws. Scores of people have been detained under various other repressive state laws. This includes journalists, human rights activists, trade union activists and workers, cultural activists, comedians, environmentalists, youth, students, farmers, electricity and industrial workers, and large numbers of minorities, to create a false narrative of internal terrorism and threat to the nation.

It was a black day for democracy, when the U.S. Capitol was ‘invaded’ on 6 January 2021.

Last year a ‘National Campaign to Defend Democracy’ was launched when 165 movements, platforms and organizations, representing thousands of citizens, gave a call for a country-wide action to save our democracy: marking the international day for Indigenous people & Quit India movement day, as a day of Public Action. The action all over the country continued until 28 August with India’s Independence Day (15 August) being the high point, when thousands pledged to campaign for the repeal of draconian laws and to protect our democracy. The Pledge read: “On the occasion of the 75th Independence Day, on 15th August, we pledge to defend the legacy of our Freedom Movement, the spirit of the Preamble and the values of our Constitution. We pledge to campaign for repealing all draconian laws and assert the right to bail of every citizen. We believe that the right to question and the Right to Dissent are the foundation of our democratic, secular and socialist republic. We commit to campaign against all ideologies, laws, and state actions that deprive us of the freedoms of speech and opinion, conscience, association, and to non-violent opposition”.

Strongmen, dictators, those who attempt to destroy democracy and democratic institutions have with them money. They are able to buy up people, silence them, blackmail them. Then there is muscle. They use violence to intimidate, harass, incarcerate and even kill, and the military establishment usually toes their line. They are adept at manipulation of both minds and machines. They have with them the media. ‘Tell a lie a thousand times and people will accept it as the truth.’ That was the dictum of Josef Goebbels, the information minister of Hitler.

Democracy in India and across the world is surely in peril. However, there is hope. ‘We the people’ of India need to do all we can to protect and promote our democracy. As a people we also need to internalize and actualize that prophetic prayer of our Nobel laureate, Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore:

“Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high;
Where knowledge is free;
Where the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls;
Where words come out from the depth of truth;
Where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection;
Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit;
Where the mind is led forward by thee into ever-widening thought and action –
Into that heaven of freedom, my Father, let my country awake”.


Fr. Cedric Prakash, SJ (GUJ) is a well-known human rights, reconciliation and peace activist. He is a writer who writes regularly for Catholic and secular magazines. A recipient of several international and national awards, Cedric is currently engaged in Advocacy work.

A Christmas letter from St. Ignatius to his sons

Fr. Fio Mascarenhas, SJ, comes up with a letter St. Ignatius is likely to write to his sons on the occasion of Christmas.

By Fio Mascarenhas, SJ

“Dearest 21st century sons, if only I were alive on earth today, I would dance and leap for joy! Several centuries back, with only my naked eyes, I used to love to gaze at the stars every night, and I received much spiritual consolation at the immensity and beauty of the cosmos. So I am very thrilled at today’s new advances on earth in the sciences of astronomy and cosmology. You know that in my Autobiography, I wrote, “The greatest consolation he received was from gazing at the sky and the stars, and this he often did and for quite a long time. The result of all this was that he felt within himself a strong impulse to serve our Lord.”

If I were alive on earth today, I would give even “greater glory to God” on seeing the new photos from the James Webb telescope which one of my sons, the Director of the Vatican Observatory, Br Guy Consolmagno, has described as “jaw-droppingly exciting images offering a tantalising glimpse of what we can learn about the universe in the future; and these new advances in science are a necessary food for the human spirit!”

I know that this telescope was launched on Christmas Day two years ago, and that, as Br Guy writes, “it is our attempt to use our God-given intelligence to understand the logic of the universe. The universe wouldn’t work if it weren’t logical. But as these images show, the universe is not only logical, it is also beautiful! This is God’s creation being revealed to us, and in it we can see both His astonishing power and His love of beauty.” As I wrote 500 years ago, for me too, “The result of all this (star-gazing) was that he felt within himself a strong impulse to serve our Lord.

I am glad that what the Church has been calling “the Ignatian charism” endures even today, and that millions of my followers are doing small and great things to implement the Lord’s prayer: Thy Kingdom Come! I claim to have been second to none in my personal love for Jesus of Nazareth! Once I was converted from the service of worldly lords and ideals, I became tremendously attached to Christ, my newfound and eternal Lord, in whose service I wished to distinguish myself “like a noble knight.” The name of Jesus meant so much to me that I called my religious family by that name alone; and in my Diary can be found this revealing entry: “I recalled to mind that moment when the Heavenly Father associated me with his Divine Son, and I felt a burning longing that He might engrave deeply within my heart the name of JESUS” (February 23, 1544).

As these images show, the universe is not only logical, it is also beautiful! This is God’s creation being revealed to us, and in it we can see both His astonishing power and His love of beauty.

As I have always taught, the central truths of Christianity will be life-transforming for a Christian only when they have truly affected the heart, and not just the head. Hence, I again encourage you, my Jesuits and their retreatants, dailyto ponder with great affection how much God our Lord has done for me” (Spiritual Exercises, n.234), to “emit a cry of wonder accompanied by surging emotion” (n.60), to “be inflamed with love,” to “experience consolations” and “great fervour,” “to be glad and rejoice intensely” (nn. 15,6,14,221), because Jesus, the Lord and Saviour, loves “me” and calls “me.” I re-iterate forcefully that the whole purpose of human life is “to praise, reverence, and serve God” (n.23), and my favourite phrase regarding the disciple’s response continues to be, “the service and praise of God” (nn.20, 46, 98…).

That many have done just this is part of the happy history of my Society! Men of the calibre of Francis Xavier and Mateo Ricci, Peter Canisius and Robert Bellarmine, Isaac Jogues and John de Brebeauf, Teilhard de Chardin and Karl Rahner, Gerard Manley Hopkins, Pedro Arrupe, recently your own Stan Swamy, and, of course, our dear Pope Francis have served the Church and humanity in every century and continent, and are continuing to do so in exceptional ways, filling roles as humble pastors or great educationists, grass-roots social activists or skilled scientists, doing their best for “the greater glory of God” – also unto martyrdom, for some of them. May your current UAPs (which please me greatly) continue to make all Jesuits Spirit-filled and Spirit-led in the coming months and years!

The name of Jesus meant so much to me that I called my religious family by that name alone; and in my Diary can be found this revealing entry: “I recalled to mind that moment when the Heavenly Father associated me with his Divine Son, and I felt a burning longing that He might engrave deeply within my heart the name of JESUS” (February 23, 1544).

I lovingly remind you that my “Ignatian spirituality” is to be summed up by the motto: “Service in the Church, under the banner of the Cross, for the glory of the Father.”  Overwhelmed with zeal for the spread of Christ’s Kingdom, I composed the now well-known prayer of self-offering, noting that you too should pray it “as one would do who is moved by great feeling“(n.234): “Take O Lord, and receive all, my liberty…”

Convinced that “love ought to manifest itself in deeds rather than in words,” I recommend to you, my spiritual children, to ask repeatedly for the grace not only to labour much for the Kingdom in your post-modern secularist world, but also to do it in that same way as Jesus, our Leader, did – “by imitating and being identified with the suffering and humiliated Christ,even bearing all wrongs and all abuse and all poverty” (n.98), should that be God’s will for them.

As background for this recommendation, I think it is right that I remind you of my understanding of the Devil’s strategy: First they are to tempt them to covet riches, that they may the more easily attain the empty honours of this world, and then come to overweening pride.  From these three steps the Evil One leads to all other vices.”  On the other hand, Christ’s way is to invite humanity to “the highest spiritual, and even actual, poverty (as opposed to riches); then, to insults or contempt (as opposed to the honour of this world); and from these to let spring humility (as opposed to pride).  From these three steps, to lead human persons to all other virtues” (nn.142,146).

With a special love for the Blessed Virgin Mary as your own Mother and Queen, I advise you daily to enter, like I did, into a colloquy with Mary.

I remind you also of the need for frequent petitionary prayer as a special characteristic of my spirituality. With a special love for the Blessed Virgin Mary as your own Mother and Queen, I advise you daily to enter, like I did, into a colloquy with Mary, asking her to intercede with and obtain from her Son the graces desired: “an intimate knowledge of our Lord, who has become man for me, that I may love him more, and follow him more closely.” This prayer is then to be directed to Jesus, asking him to obtain the same graces from the Father. Finally, as you know, the colloquy is to be directed confidently to the Father himself.

Let me add a final note about “sin.” Your modern psychologists measure human maturity in terms of one’s relationships. The wider and deeper one’s relationships (with God, other human beings, and creation itself), the more is a person judged to be “mature.” In biblical terms as well, a mature person is one who is able spontaneously and consistently to show forth in his life the “fruit of the Spirit” (Gal.5:22), namely, love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. These “fruit” are relational gifts, for they enable a human person to establish and deepen felicitous relationships with others.

Sin, then, is culpable failure in establishing, maintaining, and deepening one’s relationship with God, with others, and with creation. Remind yourself about this truth, teach it to your people, especially to the youth of your times! Remember that my world-view is of a vast spiritual battlefield where the forces of Good are engaged ceaselessly in a fierce war with the forces of Evil. Insist therefore not only on the need for courage and generosity, but also for wise discernment. To conclude, though I would love to write more, know that my Christmas gift to you from heaven is a special prayer for each of you to receive anew the spirit of Magis!”


Fiorello Mascarenhas, SJ, almost 79 years, soon to celebrate 60 years as a Jesuit, resides in the Retreat House, Mumbai. He is the Emeritus Chairman of the Catholic Bible Institute. He was awarded the Doctor of Ministry degree (Biblical Spirituality) from Catholic Theological Union, Chicago, and was Chairman (1981-1987) of the International Council for Catholic Charismatic Renewal resident in Vatican City. He has visited over 80 countries to preach at Clergy Retreats, Bible Seminars, and Leaders Conferences, and has authored 18 books, several translated into many languages.

“Democracy is never easy”

In this exclusive interview to INI, Thomas Reese, SJ, an American Jesuit, speaks about democracy, politics and the Church in the United States.

Interview with Thomas Reese, SJ

Thomas Reese, SJ, is an American Jesuit priest, author, and journalist. He worked in Washington as a writer and lobbyist for tax reform from 1975 to 1978. He was an associate editor of America magazine from 1978 to 1985 and editor-in-chief from 1998 to 2005. He was a senior fellow at the Woodstock Theological Center from 1985 to 1998 and 2006 to 2013. He is the author of a trilogy on the organization and politics of the Church: Archbishop: Inside the Power Structure of the American Catholic Church (1989), A Flock of Shepherds: The National Conference of Catholic Bishops (1992), and Inside the Vatican: The Politics and Organization of the Catholic Church (1996). In 2014, Reese was appointed by President Barack Obama to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, an independent, bipartisan U.S. federal government commission that reviews the facts and circumstances of religious freedom violations and makes policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State, and Congress.

Isn’t it a tragic irony that democracy is under such a serious threat in a country that was seen for decades as the world’s foremost defender and promoter of democracy? What led to this situation?

Democracy is never easy. So are the values of “liberty and justice for all.” Setting one group against another, especially poor whites against Blacks, has been a frequent part of American life. In addition, some liberal elites have a disdain for religious and traditional values, which then causes a kickback.

How is it that Donald Trump has the trust and support of so many Americans even after they saw all that he did and how often he lied during his term as the U.S. President?

His supporters feel threatened and disenfranchised, and he feeds these fears and resentments to the point that they believe he is the only one who can protect them. They are fed lies by him and his supporters in the media. “I want the meanest, toughest SOB I can find to protect this nation,” Southern Baptist pastor Robert Jeffress explained in his 2016 defense of Trump.

Another thing that non-Americans find hard to understand is the number of innocent Americans, including students, who die year after year, as a result of gun violence. You don’t see this anywhere else in the developed or developing world. Why has the country been unable to find a solution to this problem that has been festering for many years?

American TV and movies have, for decades, given us a steady diet of movies where a good guy with a gun defeats bad guys with guns. For many men, having a gun is part of their masculinity. Plus, the National Rifle Association has a good propaganda machine and many members who will vote against any politician wanting to restrict guns.

Let us come to the Church in the U.S. Is it true that the U.S. Church is as hopelessly divided as the American society? Is it true that Trump has the support of a large number of U.S. Catholics, including bishops? 

The Catholic vote was split evenly between those supporting Trump and those supporting Biden. Among white Catholics, 57% backed Trump and 42% backed Biden, according to VoteCast. Among Hispanic Catholics, VoteCast shows 67% backed Biden and 32% backed Trump. My guess is that the bishops, who are mostly white, voted like white Catholics. The bishops who got the most media attention were those who attacked Biden for his position on abortion.

Trump’s supporters feel threatened and disenfranchised, and he feeds these fears and resentments to the point that they believe he is the only one who can protect them.

Pope Francis has talked about the power of ideology to make people blind to reality. If it is the ideology that makes the American society and the Church so hopelessly divided, can a majority of Americans be ever mobilized to see and do what is good, what is right for their country and the Church?

In American politics, there are ideologues on the right and the left. Most Americans are more pragmatic, but the ideologues make more noise. Historically, the ideologues overplay their hand and people turn against them, but this can take time.

In the church, the conservative ideologues felt supported by the papacies of John Paul and Benedict. Now they feel betrayed and disenfranchised by Francis. The left, who were silenced and condemned under these papacies, is impatient with Francis because they have an agenda they want him to implement. The average Catholic is more supportive of the liberal agenda, but is also disillusioned by the sex abuse crisis and the clericalism of the clergy.

My guess is that the bishops, who are mostly white, voted like white Catholics.

What percentage of U.S. Catholics would admire Pope Francis and share his vision for the Church?  

According to the Pew Research Center, “The pope’s favorability also has remained steady among U.S. Catholics, with 82% of Catholics in both the March 2021 and February 2020 surveys saying they have a favorable opinion of the pope.” There are, however, partisan differences: “In the latest survey, 90% of Catholic Democrats expressed a favorable opinion of the pope, compared with 73% of Catholic Republicans and GOP leaners.”

How did the first and the second phase of the Synod go in the U.S. dioceses?

I am not sure because they have received very little media coverage. One gets the impression that the synodal process is not a priority of the U.S. bishops.

Lastly tell us about American Jesuits and Jesuit institutions. What are the challenges that they face at present?

American Jesuits are enthusiastic for Pope Francis and his agenda, but we are suffering from a lack of vocations. We can no longer staff our schools and other ministries. It is painful to acknowledge that we cannot do all we used to do, let alone do new things. We have to figure out how to hand our institutions over to the laity in a way that continues their mission. Our high schools have been more successful at that than our universities.


Child and children

This issue, released on Children’s Day, celebrates Christmas, democracy, science and selfless missionaries.

Friends,

Greetings! I am delighted to meet you again digitally. This issue is dated October-December, 2022. Once ‘December’ comes in, it brings along with it things related to the central event in human history – the birth of Jesus. This is why we deliberately delayed this issue of INI. If we ‘send’ it in October, Christmas may look like something that is still far away.

This is why we chose 14 November for the release of this issue. It is right in the middle of the three-month period.  It is a day which is observed as ‘Children’s Day’ in India. It was born of the desire of India’s first Prime Minister after the country won political independence from the British. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru wanted his birthday that fell on 14 November to be celebrated as ‘Children’s Day’ every year.

By the way, about a week later, the rest of the world will celebrate Children’s Day, as the UNICEF-sponsored ‘World Children’s Day’ is observed on  20 November.

Children’s Day, whenever it may be celebrated, should remind us of Christmas, a feast that celebrates the birth of a Child.

Won’t it be wonderful to hear from your father for Christmas? In this issue we have an excellent article written by Fr. Fio Mascarenhas, SJ, who has come up with a letter that St. Ignatius would write to his men on the occasion of Christmas.

Have you seen a video poem? It is one of those marvels that are possible only in an online magazine like INI. The poem I have attempted is on Christmas in a world ravaged by a pandemic and a senseless, cruel war and its consequences.

This issue carries two interesting interviews. The interview with Fr. Thomas Reese, SJ, a well-known American journalist and writer, focuses on the plight of democracy in the U.S. It also enlightens readers from other countries who feel puzzled about quite a few things in that great, crazy country. Won’t you agree that the U.S. is undoubtedly great and indisputably crazy? Its greatness comes from the values of its founding fathers. Its craziness comes from the unlimited freedom which the unscrupulous exploit.

The other interview is of a veteran missionary. For nearly a century it was the missionaries from Europe – Jesuits and others – who took it upon themselves to proclaim the good news of Jesus here. The situation has now changed completely. Now it is priests from India who go to all parts of the world to serve in parishes that would otherwise have no pastors, because of the tragic lack of vocations in the West. In the interview, the Indian Jesuit who has completed 50 years as a missionary in Indonesia, talks of his life as a missionary. A remarkable milestone in his missionary life was the magnificent Marian shrine he managed to build in Medan, Indonesia. You must read his interview if you want to find out how he managed to do this in a country that is not his own. 

Fr. Cedric Prakash’s article explains why democracy is in peril everywhere. Cedric gives us a list of places where recently parties that stand for democracy, diversity, peace and unity have experienced a shocking set back and how right wing parties, headed by persons who care a hoot for democratic values, have seized power. Today’s news adds one more country to that frightening list – Israel.

In an autobiographical article, Fr. S. Ignacimuthu, SJ, who won recently two awards for his contribution to botany and science in general, explains how he came to acquire a passion for scientific research and how he managed to achieve all he has done in the field of botany.

A writer should know his readers, a speaker his audience. Do our teachers know their students? Do they understand and empathize with them?  An article that would be helpful to all educators is the one written by a veteran educator, Fr. V. Joseph Xavier, on the peculiar traits of Gen Z or the Z Generation to which our students belong. 

So let this issue of INI reward you with knowledge and understanding as well as pleasure and enjoyment that only reading can provide!

May you and all your dear ones have a blessed, joyous Christmas and a happy, hope-filled 2023!

– M.A. Joe Antony, SJ

What does the Synod say about us?

M.A. Joe Antony, SJ suggests the ways in which we respond to the Synod on Synodality will reveal a great deal about ourselves.

By M.A. Joe Antony, SJ

There are certain events which reveal to you things about yourself, even things you may not have fully realized or acknowledged. Think of Jesus’ death on the cross. All those who were in Jerusalem on that day would have realized who exactly they were by looking at how they responded to this event that darkened the sky and opened the doors of paradise. You must have heard the song that asks, “Were you there when they crucified my Lord?”

The Second Vatican Council is one such event. By their response to what it meant and what it brought people still continue to reveal themselves. The Synod for a Synodal Church which started last October in all Catholic dioceses across the world and will conclude in October 2023 in Rome is another event of such magnitude. If we think of what it aims to bring about in the way the Church conducts its affairs, we can claim that this Synod is the next most significant event in the recent history of the Church.

Most probably in the vision of Pope Francis this Synod has the pride of place among the reforms he has managed to bring in as well as the reforms he hopes to usher in. We know that the film The Two Popes, is a clever mix of fact and creative imagination. But if you have seen it, you’d understand why the much-needed changes are important to Pope Francis and all those Cardinals who elected him. The film will have you believe that even the Pope Emeritus, Benedict XVI, thought it was time for change and so for someone like him to retire and someone like Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio to become the Pope.

This is why, right from the beginning of his pontificate, Pope Francis has spent his time and energy trying to bring in changes that would make the Church relevant today. He does not see the Church as an isolated castle guarded by fierce soldiers. He sees the Church as a field-hospital that moves where the wounded lie, waiting for people who would care for them and cure them. 

He has brought changes  in spite of the opposition and criticism he has faced from those who do not want change.  He has tightened rules and norms so that in the future the clergy who would abuse children and adolescents would be held responsible and face action. He has appointed women to important posts in the Church. He has repeatedly emphasized that the Church should not condemn or shun the LBGTQ people but should treat them with kindness and understanding. He has done even what many thought impossible. With the help of a committee that worked for nine years and met over forty times, he has recently promulgated what are called ‘Curial reforms’ – reform of the Roman Curia. But the changes he wants to usher in through this Synod on the Synodal way must be more important to him than anything else.

Why is this important to him and all those who think like him?

An example from recent Church history may illustrate what happens when the Church abandons the synodal way of doing things and resorts to its very opposite. The first English translation of the Roman Missal was done in 1973. Since many felt the need for a better, improved translation an international committee of experts was formed in the mid 1980s. After working for several years they managed to come up with a translation in 1998 that many considered excellent. It turned out to be so good that 11 out of 12 Bishops Conferences of English-speaking countries approved it enthusiastically.

The changes Pope Francis wants to usher in through this Synod on the Synodal way must be more important to him than anything else.

But they had to submit it to the Vatican Congregation for Divine Worship (liturgy) for the final approval. The Congregation sat on it, without any response. Three years later, in 2001, it came up with a document, titled Liturgiam Authenticam, with new guidelines on translating liturgical texts. In short, this affirmed that translations should be faithful and similar to the original Latin. Many experts and scholars left the Committee in order to protest this unexpected turn of events. But the Congregation appointed another committee to come up with an English translation that would be more faithful to the Latin version. What this Committee produced was published in 2010.

This translation that was imposed on all English-speaking countries raised a storm of protest from all over. Trying to be faithful to the original Latin version, this translation turned out to be abstract, difficult and unidiomatic. The structure of sentences sounded bizarre. It was full of abstract words like prevenient, consubstantial, ineffable, unfeigned etc – words even the priest would not understand.  Bishop Donald Trautman, a retired U.S. Bishop, who was a liturgist himself and a former chairman of the U.S. Bishops’ Committee on Liturgy, wrote, “This translation does not communicate in the living language of the worshipping assembly. It fails as a translation. It fails to lead to full, conscious, and active participation. It is ungrammatical, unintelligible, and unproclaimable. Our translated text is intended for prayer, worship, lifting up the heart and mind to God. If a translation – no matter how exact – does not communicate in the living language of the liturgical assembly, it fails as a translation” (The Tablet, 24 March, 2015)

Those who want to know more about what the people of God lost because of this imposed translation should read the book, Lost in Translation: the English Language and the Catholic Mass, (Liturgical Press, 2017), written by the well-known Australian Jesuit author and theologian, Fr Gerald O’Collins, SJ and John Wilkins.

When he visited Brazil in 2013, Pope Francis told the Brazilian bishops, “At times we lose people because they don’t understand what we are saying, because we have forgotten the language of simplicity and impart an intellectualism foreign to our people.”

Pope Francis has now restored to the local Bishops Conferences what was usurped by the Vatican Congregation – the right to decide on translations of the Roman Missal into the local languages. But, unfortunately, till today in several countries anyone who wants to celebrate the Eucharist in English has to put up with this translation. This is what happens when the Church abandons the synodal way and resorts to an authoritarian style – when the Church ceases to be a synodal Church and becomes a pyramidal Church.

That the Church was indeed a synodal Church in the beginning would be clear to anyone who reads the Acts of the Apostles.

That the Church was indeed a synodal Church in the beginning would be clear to anyone who reads the Acts of the Apostles. All those who loved Jesus and believed in him – men and women – were together. What united them were fellowship and prayer (Acts 1: 12-14).

Chapter 15 of the Acts describes how the Church handled an issue that threatened to divide the followers of Jesus. Jesus and all his disciples were obviously Jews. But after Paul and his companion Barnabas began to preach the good news of Jesus in Antioch several non-Jews began to believe in him and follow the new ‘Way’.  Some Jews who came to Antioch from Judea told the new Christians that it was not enough for them to accept Jesus and his teachings. They insisted that like all Jewish males, the new Christians too had to get circumcised.

Paul  and Barnabas, leaders of the Church in Antioch, want to discuss this with the apostles and leaders of the Church in Jerusalem and so they travel to Jerusalem. Christian leaders in Jerusalem warmly welcome their counterparts from Antioch. All are determined to find out what the Lord would want. So they dialogue, listen to one another with respect and an open mind. They discern. This synodal process helps them find an amicable solution to the problem created by some Jews affected by a blind zeal. They decide that, except for a few things they see as essential, they would not burden the non-Jewish converts with an insistence on circumcision or any other Jewish practice. This decision gladdens the hearts of non-Jewish Christians in Antioch.

While the synodal Church unites, the authoritarian Church divides. The synodal process makes everyone happy, while other ways of arriving at decisions that affect everyone disappoint, and antagonize many who may like to quit. A Church that journeys together, prays fervently, shares freely, listens keenly and thus builds a consensus is the Church that will carry every pilgrim in its onward journey. That is the kind of Church that Jesus would have envisioned. That is the kind of Church that his followers would have naturally formed, if they let themselves be guided by his Spirit – not by politics, men in power or ideology.

Therefore, let us allow this Synod to reveal who and what we truly are. It will do so, if we watch carefully what we think, pray for, say and do regarding this historic Synod.

Sri Lanka: Crisis & Opportunity

Elil Rajendram, SJ talks of what is hidden in the serious crisis that Sri Lanka faces today – a rare opportunity to find a solution to the longstanding problem of racial, linguistic discrimination.

By Elil Rajendram, SJ

This article was written weeks before the latest developments in Sri Lankan politics – like the protestors storming the presidential palace and the (former) President, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, fleeing the country.

Social media in Sri Lanka are full of pictures of people standing in long queues for hours, if not days, for fuel, gas, etc. The news of people dying while waiting for fuel and gas in the long queues have become a new normal. News of babies dying without even basic medicines have shocked the entire country. 

In some of the remote villages we visited people have shifted to two meals per day.  That should not surprise anyone, as prices of essential items have skyrocketed. The number of youth waiting in long queues in front of the immigration office to get their passport proves the younger generation’s uncertainty regarding their future and their desire to leave the country. It is sure to lead to a brain drain in Sri Lanka.

I see three stages of the Sri Lankan people’s struggle. First, they took to the streets initially, demanding the government to address the unprecedented economic crisis. Later the struggle developed into an explicit political agenda demanding the change of regime (#gohomerajapaksas#). The third phase demanded a structural change, including abolition of executive presidency.

The causes for this unprecedented crisis are said to be many. Mismanagement of resources, appointment of incompetent people to important posts by the current government, nepotism, excessive borrowing and failure to restructure the debt and the excessive greed of one family that accumulated wealth at the expense of the public, have led to the current situation.

People have now begun to demand that all the MPs should go and the governance of the country should be handed over to a set of professionals until normalcy returns. Most of the MPs are past the age of retirement, including the current Prime Minister, who stated recently that the crisis situation is “going to get worse before it gets better.” The Sri Lankan government has asked for humanitarian assistance from the UN and other countries.

The politicians chose to ignore the plea of the people when they protested, declaring ‘enough is enough.’  The plea fell on deaf ears. The parliamentary debates have become jokes of the year. As one political cartoonist said recently, Sri Lanka remains the best in the world in recycling, as the MPs and ministers are appointed again and again. The drama of tendering their resignation from the ministerial portfolios has exposed the ‘system failure’.

The economic policies adopted remain foreign to the land. Sri Lanka, after its independence in 1948, had a general strike in 1953.  After about 70 years it faces another people’s struggle. The protesters have established ‘Gota Go Gama’, at Galle Face Green, a small village where a library, first aid centre, legal aid office, IT centre, recycling centre, community kitchen, and art gallery have been set up. They have begun to cultivate vegetables and fruit trees to indicate that they are here for a long haul. What is novel and significant is that the protesters are a mixed group. There are students, professionals, activists, and the middle class who earlier aligned with the elite. This model, established at Galle Face Green as ‘Gota Go Gama’ has been duplicated in other parts of the Island.

On 9 May an organized gang, consisting of supporters of the present regime, attacked the peaceful protesters. Still the protesters have not given up their struggle. They have no leader as such, but operate on core objectives which they have declared they would not compromise or negotiate. Their primary objective is to make the Rajapaksa family leave office. But Gotabaya Rajapaksa, the President, has vowed to stay in office, until he finishes his term. He says he does not want to go down in history as a failed President.

What is significant is the people who are demanding a regime change are mainly the Sinhalese people, the majority. The involvement of the North-East, where the dominant population are Tamils, is very minimal.

What is significant is the people who are demanding a regime change are mainly the Sinhalese people, the majority. The involvement of the North-East, where the dominant population are Tamils, is very minimal.

A study done on world protests from 2006 to 2020  (World Protests: A Study of Key Protest Issues in the 21 st  Century. Global Social Justice, Initiative for Policy Dialogue, New York, 2022), suggests that the cause of the highest number (1503) of protests is the failure of politicians. It may be true that the Rajapaksa family have contributed more than anyone else to this crisis. But to claim only they are responsible for this mess is not correct. This crisis was waiting to happen for decades.

Consecutive governments borrowed loans to fight the Tamil rebels, and allocated massive budget funds and other resources to the war in the North-East. This was used as an excuse to justify or ignore the massive political corruption. After the army managed to crush the Tamil rebels in May 2009, the Rajapaksas exploited this victory to win the hearts of the majority Sinhalese as well as the elections with the massive support of 6.9 million voters. It is widely believed that after assuming power they looted the country. The government continued to allocate an enormous share of the budget for the armed forces and national security.

The present crisis and the consequent protests have not united the two linguistic communities. The South demands a structural change that refers to reforms within the unitary state structure, mainly the abolition of executive presidency. But for the Tamils of the North East structural change would mean the change of the unitary state structure itself. The political project of regime change may be enough for the Sinhalese but, in itself, it is not the solution for the many problems that the Tamils still face.  In 2015 the former president Maithiripala Sirisena became the game changer who defeated Rajapaksa but the system remained intact. A mere change of regime, therefore, would not solve all the major problems of the country.

The protesters emphasize accountability too. There is no question that corruption charges need to be investigated and those responsible should be legally tried in order to rid the system of corruption. Yet at the same time, while the protesters demand accountability, they are not yet ready to accept the history of racial, linguistic discrimination that reached its climax in Mullivaikal, where thousands of Tamils died. So for the protesters who want the present regime to go accountability means the corrupt being tried and being made to pay for their swindling public money. For the Tamils, however, accountability would mean that all those who were responsible for the violence unleashed on linguistic minorities should face the legal consequences of the racial discrimination and violence.

The political project of regime change may be enough for the Sinhalese but, in itself, it is not the solution for the many problems that the Tamils still face.

The protests organised in the North-East, demanding justice for land grabbing and other crimes  indulged in by the military, have been brutally dealt with by the armed forces, who almost always employ repressive measures and criminalise the resistance. On the other hand the armed forces have not employed any repressive measures against the protesters now who blame the present government for the unprecedented crisis. A joint statement by some civil society groups from the North-East and the South states that there is a link between addressing the root cause of the Tamil national question and the current economic crisis. Without addressing the root cause – the genuine aspirations of the Tamils and their political demands there cannot be peace in the Island. All the people of Sri Lanka – from all linguistic and religious  communities -should  come together to seize this historical moment in order to find a lasting solution for all the problems that Sri Lanka faces. Every cloud has a silver lining. So even from the present troubling crisis can come effective solutions to grave problems that Sri Lanka has faced  for quite a long time. It is a serious crisis, sure. But it also is a rare opportunity. 


Elil Rajendram, SJ is a Sri Lankan Jesuit. A political analyst, he contributes regularly to a national newspaper.

Seeing the Indian youth anew

Arockiasamy Xavier, SJ points out that we need to see the changes Indian youth have undergone in the recent past.

By Arockiasamy Xavier, SJ

Introduction

Can we see our youth anew? But that is what Fr General has called us to. In his letter to the whole Society dated 15 January 2021, Fr. Arturo Sosa has called us to see all things anew.

Before we can look at our youth it is important to understand the present Indian context in which our youth find themselves.

Way back in 1623 the Propaganda Fide wrote to the Portuguese missionaries in China, “Do not Portugaise the Chinese, rather Chinese yourselves.” Hence understanding our Indian context is crucially important for our mission. We need to understand mainly our political, economic, and social context that affects our youth in several ways.

Political Context

With the support of the central government communal forces are trying to establish Manu dharma, the ideology of Sanathana Dharma that still holds up the caste hierarchy.

A discerning eye can see the ominous signs in the appointments of people who subscribe to this ideology to the state’s highest posts, provocative speeches that seek to destroy the secular fabric of the country, and the arrests of anyone who dares to criticize the government etc. These forces believe in exploiting the religious sentiment of the majority Hindus. Their aim is said to be to turn the whole country into a Hindu Rashtra. They engage in smart social coalitions or social engineering. Funds are poured in for elections. They follow the strategy of creating chaos even in rural areas, with the objective of polarizing the people on the basis of religion, where people of all religions have lived in peace for centuries. Their foot soldiers try in every possible way to disturb and divide through lies, myths, and meticulously-planned strategies.

Economic Context

Any assessment of the present context cannot ignore the manifold impact of the pandemic. An article titled “7 Lessons from the Pandemic” says, “Covid’s first lesson is to wield the hammer of state power cautiously, treading softly on people’s lives… At a stroke, millions lost their jobs. For a daily wage earner this meant poverty.”  (Times of India, 02 April, 2022) While ordinary people lost their jobs and were pushed into poverty, the health industries, using the crisis, amassed wealth. They looted people’s hard-earned money with the knowledge of the government.

Therefore today’s rulers seem to have no patience for anyone who speaks up for the poor, and the marginalized. Many NGOs, which work for the poor, Dalits and other marginalized communities, are denied a renewal of their license to receive foreign funds. This is an indirect way to stop their work of empowering the people at the periphery.

Socialism has been replaced by crony capitalism, which is an economic system in which capitalist businesses thrive through collusion between the business class and the political class.

Socialism has been replaced by crony capitalism, which is an economic system in which capitalist businesses thrive through collusion between the business class and the political class. Business interests enjoy a close, mutually beneficial relationship with state power and therefore easily obtain permits, government grants, tax breaks, or other forms of state intervention. Where crony capitalism prevails, business interests exercise undue influence over the state’s deployment of public goods, for example, mining concessions for primary commodities or contracts for public works.

Social Context

Exploiting religion to gain political power, the communal forces have been working hard in villages to create conflicts among the various communities by sowing seeds of suspicion and hatred.

What happened in a village called Michaelpatti in Tamil Nadu is a classical example of their strategy to polarize the people through false accusations. Anyone who wants to know what really happened can find the news in the internet. The functionaries of communal outfits alleged  – with no evidence whatever – that the Sisters who ran a school for more than a century attempted to convert a Hindu student who stayed in their school hostel to Christianity. It proved that they can make a big issue out of nothing.

The majority of the Indian work force consists of Dalits and women who are still facing subjugation, and deprivation. Dalits continue to be the victims of caste atrocities in many places. Adivasis have to fight for their legitimate rights and equal place in the society. In some villages the communal forces are trying to recruit the Dalit youth.

The plight of the women of the marginalized communities, the worst-affected people during Covid’19, is very pathetic. Many women, especially widows who were doing menial works in various sectors, lost their jobs.

Seeing the Youth Anew:

This is our context. Let us now focus on youth – as one of our UAPs reminds us. They are our future, and this planet’s future.

Luckily, we engage the youth not merely in our schools and colleges, but also in our social action centres, parishes, youth movements like AICUF, counselling centres, de-addiction centres, and media centres.

But there are plenty of questions we need to ask ourselves. Do we understand our youth? Do we understand their problems and struggles in the post-pandemic era? Do we understand the baits that attract them to divisive, communal forces?

Targetted by divisive forces: Having understood that the unemployed subaltern youth endure listless lives in a world of uncertainty, the divisive forces are brainwashing them, and trying through several ways to bring them into their fold. In their project to polarize the people on the basis of religion, their main target is youth. It is a serious concern that because of the strategies of these cunning groups that do not believe in secularism, democracy, unity and peace, sanctity of the Indian Constitutions, some youths have already become powerful agents in their hands to carry out their tasks.

Affected by the pandemic: Nothing else has shaken and confused our youth as Covid 19. We saw the agony of the youth in the unorganized sector after the abrupt announcement of a nation-wide lock down in March 2020. From places where they worked, they began walking for hundreds and hundreds of miles to reach home. Many lost their jobs. Quite a number of them lost their parents. Having lost the breadwinner of the family they have buried their dreams of further education and taken up jobs.

Do we understand our youth? Do we understand their problems and struggles in the post-pandemic era? Do we understand the baits that attract them to divisive, communal forces?

The Covid-19 pandemic has left the educational sector in a total chaos. Education was one of the worst affected fields in many aspects as all stakeholders such as teachers, students, parents, alumni, management, employees, were all affected badly. It shook the world of education and brought into sharp focus the academic vulnerabilities of the student community.

Digitalized:  Since schools had to be closed, teaching-learning had to be switched to online mode overnight. Online services became online businesses. Education that was a service  became partly  a business. The profit-oriented industry grabbed the chance. The rapid shift to virtual classrooms was a saviour for the privileged children with uninterrupted internet access. But the poor children without smartphones or connectivity lost out.

Loss of interest in studies, absenteeism in online classes, addiction to electronic gadgets, reduced space for students’ creativity in the learning process and in critical thinking, malpractices in online examinations, loss of values, problems in following the students up by the teachers and the management, difficulties in developing their skills and engaging them, lack of space for integral formation of students, shrinking space for their meaningful involvement in the villages and slums through their outreach or extension programmes or community service initiatives, significant student dropouts in rural areas and among the socially marginalized and economically backward communities due to acute poverty are some of the serious drawbacks of the online education.

Our institutions have no other choice but to try out blended learning, networking of Catholic and other institutions at the national and the international levels, focusing on the joint, dual and twinning degrees and offering liberally the skill-embedded, hands-on-programmes and courses to enhance the employment and entrepreneurial prospects of the students.

Despite economic and family issues or precisely because of them, a sizable population of youth are addicted to alcohol, drugs and mobile phones. Though the youth are tech-savvy, their addiction to mobile phones and gaming poses a serious problem.

Now at this critical juncture, it is our duty to address their concerns seriously. Showing them their lives have a purpose, helping them gain the right perspective in their lives, guiding them to cherish their uniqueness, helping them explore and develop their talents and creative potential, accompanying them and helping them solve their problems, nurturing them to channelize their creative energies, identifying their leadership potentials, helping them blossom in their lives, and making their talents useful for society…our tasks are endless.

For a long time we ignored the task of teaching our youth the great value of our Constitutions. Recently some efforts have been made to help our youth become aware of the unique riches of our Constitutions. We need to make our youth understand that it is their duty to safeguard it and protect it from those who are determined to undermine it.

We need to ensure that values such as liberty, social justice, equality and fraternity are popularized, widely discussed, and see that the principles enshrined in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution are learnt and protected by our youth.

How are we, as responsible educationists, going to respond to this historical situation? Will we continue to see our youth as we saw them in the past or will we see them anew – as a sector targeted by divisive forces, going through enormous hardship – economically and emotionally – because of the pandemic, facing the challenges of a digital era? May Jesus and his Spirit give us eyes that would help us see our youth in India anew in today’s context!


Fr. M. Arockiasamy Xavier, SJ (MDU), is the Principal of St. Joseph’s College, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India. A Professor of History at St. Joseph’s College, he has authored several books on history and social issues.

Can we, Jesuits, age joyfully?

Based on his own experiences, Emmanuel Arockiam, SJ points out the ways in which we are insensitive to the plight of senior Jesuits. He suggests ways in which we could age joyfully.

By Emmanuel Arockiam, SJ

Nearly 50 years ago, my novice master, who was a natural storyteller, would often act out some jokes during the conferences. It was funny as he would try mimicry and dramatize, modulating his voice. Probably, this was his technique to keep us awake during the sultry afternoons.

One of the jokes was about two retired Jesuits, both in their 80s, who were having an animated conversation in the evening after tea. He said that one of the two Jesuits was partially deaf while the other was stone deaf. One of them asked the other: “Are you going for a walk?”

“No, I am going for a walk,” was the reply from the other Jesuit.

“Oh, I thought you were going for a walk.”

“No, no… I am going for a walk.”

As novices were wont to laugh for even a silly joke, we all laughed heartily. For a few weeks, whenever someone asked a question such as, “Are you going to the chapel?” we responded without a smile, “No, no, I am going to the chapel.”

At that stage, when we were not even 20 years old, we could not realize that the joke could reflect real life. We were too young to understand the reality of old people, even though there were quite a few old Jesuits in another building in the same campus. We were ignorant of all they had been doing before they came to the so-called Home for the Aged, which was cynically called ‘Gate of Heaven’. Even though they had been stalwarts in some field of study or had achieved great things in their ministries, all that we knew about them was that they were old Jesuits. We did not grasp fully what they were going through physically and psychologically. All that we understood was that they were a spent force, and that they had nothing else to do but to rest and pray.

We had no idea about what it was to lose something that was so important and yet usually taken for granted – such as the ability to hear. We laughed at some older person who did not laugh for a joke because he could not hear the punch line. We made fun of the one who asked for the dish that was in front of him because of poor eyesight. We thought it was hilarious when somebody repeated the same question because his  long-term memory was poor. We had no knowledge about Alzheimer’s Disease, dementia or senility which creep in as people get old.

We did not consider the old people as a burden, simply because we were not in charge of them. But we, certainly, took them for granted. Don’t we do the same even now? We expected them to be always cheerful. If someone was grumpy, we frowned, and we talked about it during recreation. If someone was sick and taken to the hospital, we were curious to know what was wrong, and prayed for them during common prayer, and waited for further news. That was all.

It dawned on me a few years later that we all needed special hearts filled with empathy to understand the elderly, their suffering and their needs. While I was doing my doctoral studies in Counselling Psychology, I used to visit two old-age homes to celebrate Mass and to counsel those who were psychologically troubled. I was sad to see the gradual deterioration of the physical health and mental capacity of many residents.

Even though they had been stalwarts in some field of study or had achieved great things in their ministries, all that we knew about them was that they were old Jesuits.

Later, in a Jesuit Infirmary, I happened to meet a few people who had earlier made their mark as principals and rectors but who did not remember now where they had worked earlier or where their rooms were. In all these places, I have seen people looking straight but seeing nothing, their minds totally blank, devoid of words though they had been loquacious earlier. If I asked them what they were thinking, they would say, “Nothing.”

Many people were used to my visits on Sundays. If I passed by their beds without spending some time with them, they would invariably call me or they would complain to me later and ask me for reasons why I did not meet them. Actually, they would be waiting to ask someone for some simple help such as, “Can you draw the curtain?” “Has my sister come to see me?” “What day is it?” “Are you working here?” “Can you help me sit up for some time as my back is hurting?” “I don’t know what is wrong with my cell phone. Can you check?” They would be all eyes and ears to not miss any chance of meeting me or someone else, because they would believe that if they let that chance go, they would be helpless. They needed others’ help to be functional. They needed to interact with someone. They would be impatient and frustrated if their expectations were not fulfilled at once. Since I visited them just once a week or so, I was not so annoyed as the paid helpers, who had to be with them all the time.

I rather felt satisfied that I could spend some time to listen to them, to brighten them up with my concern for them without expecting anything from them. However, I came away with a certain amount of inexplicable sadness that I could not do a lot to reduce their suffering. My inability caused a great deal of pain that was cathartic, therapeutic, and making me a better person in understanding the reality of older people and life itself.

In one treatment center for the aged, I met three or four people who were always happy. They would take the initiative to inquire about my health. Their true concern for my welfare would often melt me. Their genuine interest in my work boosted my morale and motivated me to do more. They would voluntarily come and ask me if I needed their assistance. As it was a joy to see them, I would not come away from those homes without meeting them.

I have often wondered what keeps them happy. Aren’t they upset to be old and not young and active anymore? Are they totally devoid of the physical problems that are inevitable in their age? How do they deal with the existential angst? Have they removed the sting from death that seemed to lurk in the corner? Is their faith in God and eternal reward sustaining them and keeping them joyful?

Recently, I asked an older Jesuit if he really believed in heaven and hell. As a typical Jesuit, he answered by asking another question: “Without eternal life, wouldn’t this life on earth be meaningless?” To my query, “How do you understand after-life?” he said, “I don’t know how it will be. But I know that I will be with a loving God; it would be a state, and not a place.” When I told him that that belief would motivate him to have hope, he agreed and added, “Yes, I cannot describe it; I cannot convince other people who depend on certainty or concrete proof. However, this is my belief and the sacraments help me.”

‘Growing old gracefully’ cannot start after we cross 60 years. Those who grumble as novices or juniors would grumble more when they are old.

While I admire such joyful old Jesuits, I ask myself often, “Would I be like these happy old people or would I be a grumpy old man, a disgruntled Jesuit, a miserably depressed or angry person? Despite my study of psychology and counselling practice, would I still be filled with anxiety and worry about my health and future as many old people are? Would I have such faith as not to be in despair?” Would the Christian hope in ‘the best is yet to come’ keep my face radiant and my personality lovable?

Our musings and questions about old age in the Society of Jesus should go along with a deep faith in God. Otherwise, with all our reasoning capacity, scientific rigor, and advancement in science and technology, our hold on values would teeter, our childhood idea of a future beyond death would be relegated as obsolete, our images of heaven and hell would fall under the category of mythology, and the last phase of life would become an unbearable drudgery.

‘Growing old gracefully’ cannot start after we cross 60 years. Those who grumble as novices or juniors would grumble more when they are old. From the novitiate, if not earlier, we must develop an attitude of gratitude even for small little gifts from God, routine activities, and daily achievements in life. Early in our life, we must start an emotional bank account for storing as memories the attention, affection and appreciation we get daily. If we achieve emotional maturity and don’t lose it as we grow old, we will be able to feel satisfied about life, and maintain a loving attitude to self and others. We will live in God’s presence, even if we have to wait like Simeon and Anna.

If we pass every stage of life with gratitude and satisfaction, we will not feel useless, lonely and miserable even when we are old. A joyous life in old age is the fruit of who we are from the beginning. Life is a race; old age takes us near the final touch line. Every step we take must lead to the final stage of integrity. Joy and satisfaction are rewards we can enjoy throughout life. Every joyfully old Jesuit will inspire everyone better in his old age than in all the years of his active ministry. The joy and gratitude with which he lives the last stage of his life will preach more eloquently than all the sermons he would have preached in his active years.


Emmanuel Arockiam, SJ is the head of the Department of Counselling Psychology, St. Joseph’s College, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India. He did his Ph.D. in Counselling Psychology at Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S. He is the Director of JESCCO (Jesuit Centre for Counselling), Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India.

Exit mobile version
%%footer%%